Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PUBLIC LESS's avatar

Zdravia,

thanks for the great flow-chart.

self-eye-dance from germs AND self-eye-dance from tera-rain AND self-eye-dance from sim-sin.

Expand full comment
MitNak's avatar

Thanks for thorough critique of Lanka. It's delightful.

In Japan, just a few days ago, a rabies unvaccinated home dog bit several children, which is being heated up in SNS.

As usual, VDE guys posted proudly government documents.

By the way, I think there are three kinds of VDE.

①All viruses don't exist

②Since specific time, Virologists began confusing viruses with another agent.

③Only SARS-CoV2 doesn't exist.

Honestly, ones are rarely seen, who belong to ①.

That's because even Tom Cowan alleges ②.

He mentions to Lanka's free living virus and its "isolating method" in his book(Contagion myth, 2020).

> To find out what these particles were, and knowing that no one had described viruses living within healthy algae before, he proceeded as follows: He ground up the algae in a sort of blender, essentially to break apart the walls of the algae. Then he purified this mixture using an extremely fine filter to separate out particles the size of viruses from everything else. In this way, he obtained a pure solution of water and viruses and anything else that is the size of a virus or smaller. Then he put this mixture into a density-gradient centrifuge, which spins the solution and allows the particles to separate out into bands. The final step uses a micropipette to suck out the band that contains only the virus.7

This simple procedure is THE GOLD STANDARD FOR THE PURIFICATION AND ISOLATION OF A VIRUS from any tissue or solution. It’s not an easy process, but it is not unduly difficult either.

-Chapter 5

Talking of Lanka, he suggested that the concept of virome as analogue to microbiome, and claimed that viruses are necessary for our health to some extent.

So, for the sake of protecting their theory, what they want to say is apparently that there is no proof that viruses are causative of human disease, and so, PATHOGENIC virus doesn't exist.

Here, "isolating method" is extremely important for VDE.

According to them, it is necessary to prove the pathogenicity of viruses by "isolating" it, but current method defined by virologists is just to observe Cytopathic effect without isolating, and so it is unknown whether the effect is developed by virus or by another factor.

Thus, they dislike virologists who don't follow the same isolating method of Lanka, and Lanka is paranoid to measles virus I think.

(reference(Japanese blog): https://vvlyamagata.jimdofree.com/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/%E7%AC%AC1%E7%AB%A0-%E5%88%86%E9%9B%A2%E5%9F%B9%E9%A4%8A%E8%A9%A6%E9%A8%93/3-%E3%82%A8%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9%E8%AB%96%E6%96%87%E3%81%AE%E7%9C%9F%E5%AE%9F/

For me, it is wonder why they don't critique phage which is studied by completely same method, but for them phage is apparently not included virus.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts