I am humbled and grateful for the desire to discuss things with Me. One thing that might assist in grasping My approach is that, as My father (an aerospace engineer who worked with T. Townsend Brown) taught Me: never believe anything. Place probabilities of truth (rather than assigning "true/false" labels) based on how well any given datum explains what I see. Adjust the probabilities when new data come along that better explain what I see.
When probabilities reach 90% I start working with them as "true" but they're still open to adjustment. I never give 100% or 0% to any datum. There's always the possibility that there are data I don't have.
Anyway, given the data I have had access to, I give the probability that viruses are a boogieman created for profit and control about 99.99%. It seems there really is no evidence they are any more real than rainbow unicorns.
As for the overall germ theory... I have lower probabilities that it is incorrect, but it still comes in at 93%. All My life I have seen People "5 second rule" things, critters licking places on Their bodies that I was told if I licked Mine I would get very sick, People falling ill who had very close relationships with People who did not get sick...
And the fact that no One has proven contagion. Not One.
So... I run with the "no virus," and do suggest that the whole of germ theory is wrong.
I have known the man for many, many years and believe it or not, the boy has yet to be wrong! After 17 books, give or take a few, it’s all there. He’s my David Icke without the reptilians or the arthritis!!
Not because I'm offended, but I could use the Five Bucks. I'd even take Deer at this point. No matter how many points it had.
Any Whey...
I am the anti-Icke sans reptiles, Arthur Itis, and his Fortune and Glory.
I tried to meet him halfway with the possibilities of shapeshifters given my favorite topic of Plasmodium Slime Mold but he thought I was an irredeemable Nihilist.
Can't fault the man - I am indeed.
Want a kick in the butt?
They have been revising 'science' for so long that they discounted the Reptilian Hind Brain:
Articles like these ones makes so much sense and are true honest gems in my honourstanding gems and treasures collection!
This is the pure-i-er of lovely ways in how the Saintric Patr-i-on have us eagerly come here for - finding ways of how to start to think and reason past the weed-insensed-controler-demonized-superfluos-garbage-insertions para situs infested (proovably) too often by the gate-keeper-jobs many (tax theft dollar) paid scientists are up to.. .. This makes sense in that: starting to make sense is the only sense to wrap sensible sensibilities around our spirit and sole soul endeavors..
I have a hunch and wished to put time behind it eleqiently enough to be put on places Patrimoneous Saintric stacked on critiquing "spheric earth" with "flat arguments" that is humerously reported by a pat on Pat's shoulder as shunn by "flat earther pushers".. What a badge of honour to go to find that what you offer as a delishious new dish on the turf of someone elses smorgasboard* to find that your added lovely exotic new dish for the hungry restaurant goers hastingly got tossed away to "not upset the apple carts" or akin to something in that vein. Only "approved dishes for our smorgasboard of our flat out righteously dingy-rigid flat ways is the only pedal to the metal way flat straight away to hell".... no thinking please.. Follow the hook line and sinker swallowed down your throat untill you are fished out of the gene pool..
I have a hunch mamy intuitive observations are tricking us in ways we ought to be smarter then to be fooled by - lets call it "fooled by smoke and mirrors.."
A favorite "occulting trick" is to hide truths and wrap mist around it and tell the intended to play the fool of a gullible to focus on the mist and be sure there is ample evidence of that of what the mist wraps around still is there for anyone with tools and skills to observe it can nail it down himself all the same (unasked to do so at that) and in reason pissible to discern by anyone willing to get out of potatoe couch teritory and do some self disciplined efforts to reveal obvioys "secrets hidden in plain sight".. The smoke and mirrors guys calls wrapping truths in mist: You guessed it - to mistify!!! (to "mystify" is simply put to mistyfy!!!)
Here lies the power in plausible deniability.. Here lies the power in suspension of disbelief.. Here and now is in this Sanity-enourmous-icus Practi-Patrically Geniousicum layed out a great reminder: The actual scientific method and its tools are the gold standard and into its and unto its magnitude of order lies its own weaknesses - thus Big Bang and "cameras recorded data from space" has always the factor of trust** as a baked in weakness since it is open for manipulation and no way for you and me to check on it unless we "get'em tools ourselves".. !
My hunch is our that our own tools/senses/measurement-readings-and-their-biological-function-orientation lends us to pretty good ways to assert basic premises of science with its possible/plausible mechanisms and lends us with open clear precise methods to "crack old weaknesses" and get that "stand on giants shoulders" evolve science and even the scientific craftmanship with greater view of "matter and things"***..
I believe our ways to observe and view has in the 2-3 magnitudes above and below our "every day scales" suitable for us to have a pretty good handle on how to iron out and do actual investigations ourselves..
It appears though that the smaller the objects are it comes down to "larger and larger" instruments to "get traces of evidence out of it".. Imagine what passes for the "CERN-observatofium/laboratorium".. Seems kinda "pretty large"..
A pattern though is obviously tempting to grasp for.. : the more minute things asked for observation data of needs "larger instruments" in order to adjust fpr the acute sensitivity of the small bits..
Actually even the concepts of atoms is as head wrenching thing ascan be akin to debating flat vs sperical earth. Both discissions (atomic size object and earths massive scal vs us) are pinned on the ridiculous magnitude difference of and atoms size and your own size and earths size.. Not to mention the even more ridicolous endevor to count such miniscule part in something so magnitude of order absurdly much larger as a "you*+" are..
Going for the "flat vs spherical earth" i sense what many educated minds in past have suggested is that our natural "3-d" sense of our surrounding and the optical "tools/eyes" our telescopes seems to have ample observation**** of renders data/images/cyclical observations with spherical planetary and satelite objects in our "near space" and ergo lends itself/the data to the brilliant precisions orbital time-sequence-models proposed for our solar system - and quite honestly seems quite tasteful in our "every day world experience map" sense of thinking.. 3-d makes intuitive sense.. But to "reproduce".. Outta da ku est i on.. Better go for frying an on i on!
*** (and energy.. my favorite "news" input is Cliff High venturing into a Soviet Physicist ideas that "time is what runs the universe" bit like a pulse of 22 trillion per second of "bits of time" vs 22 trillions a second with bits "void of time"..)
**trust is actually "business/mon-eye".. Real "money" are you and me + our talents pluss efforts of labor. A king without a people has a poor patch of land - believe you me!!
I have to pull something out of the mix because it is all too amusing that that stands out.
"It appears though that the smaller the objects are it comes down to "larger and larger" instruments to "get traces of evidence out of it"." pure poetry.
Soviet Physicist ideas that "time is what runs the universe" bit like a pulse of 22 trillion per second of "bits of time"
Very interesting that he would bring this up. The fellow from the Pentagon said that the ancient indian texts had numeration that showed that number to be the clock rate of the processor that runs this Simulation. by extension I think the doom was that before this universe 'ran out of time' we would have to endure this hell for 22 trillion YEARS before it reset.
You stack on it and I’ll snack on your stack! You allow my brain some downtime ‘cause a lot of the time when I read your stacks there’s nothing left to do but eat!!
I think ole AA has met her match and then some...
Alcoholics A Nonny Mouse?
I swear that I haven't touched that stuff except for herbal tinctures.
Now that you mention it, I have been going through a number of tinctures lately...
We will see. [smile]
I am humbled and grateful for the desire to discuss things with Me. One thing that might assist in grasping My approach is that, as My father (an aerospace engineer who worked with T. Townsend Brown) taught Me: never believe anything. Place probabilities of truth (rather than assigning "true/false" labels) based on how well any given datum explains what I see. Adjust the probabilities when new data come along that better explain what I see.
When probabilities reach 90% I start working with them as "true" but they're still open to adjustment. I never give 100% or 0% to any datum. There's always the possibility that there are data I don't have.
Anyway, given the data I have had access to, I give the probability that viruses are a boogieman created for profit and control about 99.99%. It seems there really is no evidence they are any more real than rainbow unicorns.
As for the overall germ theory... I have lower probabilities that it is incorrect, but it still comes in at 93%. All My life I have seen People "5 second rule" things, critters licking places on Their bodies that I was told if I licked Mine I would get very sick, People falling ill who had very close relationships with People who did not get sick...
And the fact that no One has proven contagion. Not One.
So... I run with the "no virus," and do suggest that the whole of germ theory is wrong.
Nice to meet You!
I have known the man for many, many years and believe it or not, the boy has yet to be wrong! After 17 books, give or take a few, it’s all there. He’s my David Icke without the reptilians or the arthritis!!
You see a boy - you put $5 in his back pocket!
Not because I'm offended, but I could use the Five Bucks. I'd even take Deer at this point. No matter how many points it had.
Any Whey...
I am the anti-Icke sans reptiles, Arthur Itis, and his Fortune and Glory.
I tried to meet him halfway with the possibilities of shapeshifters given my favorite topic of Plasmodium Slime Mold but he thought I was an irredeemable Nihilist.
Can't fault the man - I am indeed.
Want a kick in the butt?
They have been revising 'science' for so long that they discounted the Reptilian Hind Brain:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7STmcKCBI_0&t
I should probably Stack on this. I think I will.
Articles like these ones makes so much sense and are true honest gems in my honourstanding gems and treasures collection!
This is the pure-i-er of lovely ways in how the Saintric Patr-i-on have us eagerly come here for - finding ways of how to start to think and reason past the weed-insensed-controler-demonized-superfluos-garbage-insertions para situs infested (proovably) too often by the gate-keeper-jobs many (tax theft dollar) paid scientists are up to.. .. This makes sense in that: starting to make sense is the only sense to wrap sensible sensibilities around our spirit and sole soul endeavors..
I have a hunch and wished to put time behind it eleqiently enough to be put on places Patrimoneous Saintric stacked on critiquing "spheric earth" with "flat arguments" that is humerously reported by a pat on Pat's shoulder as shunn by "flat earther pushers".. What a badge of honour to go to find that what you offer as a delishious new dish on the turf of someone elses smorgasboard* to find that your added lovely exotic new dish for the hungry restaurant goers hastingly got tossed away to "not upset the apple carts" or akin to something in that vein. Only "approved dishes for our smorgasboard of our flat out righteously dingy-rigid flat ways is the only pedal to the metal way flat straight away to hell".... no thinking please.. Follow the hook line and sinker swallowed down your throat untill you are fished out of the gene pool..
I have a hunch mamy intuitive observations are tricking us in ways we ought to be smarter then to be fooled by - lets call it "fooled by smoke and mirrors.."
A favorite "occulting trick" is to hide truths and wrap mist around it and tell the intended to play the fool of a gullible to focus on the mist and be sure there is ample evidence of that of what the mist wraps around still is there for anyone with tools and skills to observe it can nail it down himself all the same (unasked to do so at that) and in reason pissible to discern by anyone willing to get out of potatoe couch teritory and do some self disciplined efforts to reveal obvioys "secrets hidden in plain sight".. The smoke and mirrors guys calls wrapping truths in mist: You guessed it - to mistify!!! (to "mystify" is simply put to mistyfy!!!)
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/mistify
Here lies the power in plausible deniability.. Here lies the power in suspension of disbelief.. Here and now is in this Sanity-enourmous-icus Practi-Patrically Geniousicum layed out a great reminder: The actual scientific method and its tools are the gold standard and into its and unto its magnitude of order lies its own weaknesses - thus Big Bang and "cameras recorded data from space" has always the factor of trust** as a baked in weakness since it is open for manipulation and no way for you and me to check on it unless we "get'em tools ourselves".. !
My hunch is our that our own tools/senses/measurement-readings-and-their-biological-function-orientation lends us to pretty good ways to assert basic premises of science with its possible/plausible mechanisms and lends us with open clear precise methods to "crack old weaknesses" and get that "stand on giants shoulders" evolve science and even the scientific craftmanship with greater view of "matter and things"***..
I believe our ways to observe and view has in the 2-3 magnitudes above and below our "every day scales" suitable for us to have a pretty good handle on how to iron out and do actual investigations ourselves..
It appears though that the smaller the objects are it comes down to "larger and larger" instruments to "get traces of evidence out of it".. Imagine what passes for the "CERN-observatofium/laboratorium".. Seems kinda "pretty large"..
A pattern though is obviously tempting to grasp for.. : the more minute things asked for observation data of needs "larger instruments" in order to adjust fpr the acute sensitivity of the small bits..
Actually even the concepts of atoms is as head wrenching thing ascan be akin to debating flat vs sperical earth. Both discissions (atomic size object and earths massive scal vs us) are pinned on the ridiculous magnitude difference of and atoms size and your own size and earths size.. Not to mention the even more ridicolous endevor to count such miniscule part in something so magnitude of order absurdly much larger as a "you*+" are..
Going for the "flat vs spherical earth" i sense what many educated minds in past have suggested is that our natural "3-d" sense of our surrounding and the optical "tools/eyes" our telescopes seems to have ample observation**** of renders data/images/cyclical observations with spherical planetary and satelite objects in our "near space" and ergo lends itself/the data to the brilliant precisions orbital time-sequence-models proposed for our solar system - and quite honestly seems quite tasteful in our "every day world experience map" sense of thinking.. 3-d makes intuitive sense.. But to "reproduce".. Outta da ku est i on.. Better go for frying an on i on!
*** (and energy.. my favorite "news" input is Cliff High venturing into a Soviet Physicist ideas that "time is what runs the universe" bit like a pulse of 22 trillion per second of "bits of time" vs 22 trillions a second with bits "void of time"..)
*seriously all smargasbord eaters: it is originally smörgåsbord!!!! https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sm%C3%B6rg%C3%A5sbord
*https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sm%C3%B6rg%C3%A5sbord
**trust is actually "business/mon-eye".. Real "money" are you and me + our talents pluss efforts of labor. A king without a people has a poor patch of land - believe you me!!
Dude,
Baked-In Weakness...
I have to pull something out of the mix because it is all too amusing that that stands out.
"It appears though that the smaller the objects are it comes down to "larger and larger" instruments to "get traces of evidence out of it"." pure poetry.
Soviet Physicist ideas that "time is what runs the universe" bit like a pulse of 22 trillion per second of "bits of time"
Very interesting that he would bring this up. The fellow from the Pentagon said that the ancient indian texts had numeration that showed that number to be the clock rate of the processor that runs this Simulation. by extension I think the doom was that before this universe 'ran out of time' we would have to endure this hell for 22 trillion YEARS before it reset.
You stack on it and I’ll snack on your stack! You allow my brain some downtime ‘cause a lot of the time when I read your stacks there’s nothing left to do but eat!!
I think we've made some progress here.
You used to say that when you read my books that they were the cure for insomnia.
Maybe I can market my work for eating disorders now.
They also double as furniture boosters and self defense objects.
This is out of my league, I’m going back to my tincture shots now. 😵💫