Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patrick Jordan's avatar

Already off to a rousing start.

I get a kick out of back-and-forth on both sides.

Two of y'all mentioned the perfect circle of the sun or bubbles. Even the ancient Egyptians depicted the sun as a perfect disc. But Tyson Chicken said that the EARTH would look like a PEAR from space... citing that under grabbity that bodies tend to assume the buldge of an oblate spheroid.

Leaning into the grabbity is not a force but a sag in the spandex of space, and the whore-bits of the plane-its are relatively in an orbital plane then the sun from its side should look like an M&M. It does not. It is a perfect circle. That is way I was so attracted to that Indian dude who had complex helicies of planets chasing the sun in sinusoidal patterns because that would presume that we were looking at the ASS END of the sun because only then would the M&M look round.

After confronting: Flat Water/Flat Earth did I abandon even the Helical orbit model.

Yeah, I know... water curves around the ball without seeking level because... becau... be...

REFRACTION!

Thing of it is with that spandex Einschtenian nonsense is that grabbity is a three-d phenomenon but the Physics for Dummies has it graphed out ONLY in two dimentias. Therefore no one EVER explains the oblate spheroid problem in THREE DIMENSIONS since in 'space' there is no up or down so how to you orient planetary rings, moons, and buldge in infinite free fall in all directions?

Expand full comment
Wayne Lusvardi's avatar

FYI, I am now blogging at MachiavellianMan 2 @ substack as my original stack is inaccessible by me. I may try and retrieve all the emails from prior subscribers and export them to the new stack. Wayne Lusvardi

Expand full comment
144 more comments...

No posts