I mean is it really profiling? If 13% of the population is responsible for 54% of all the crime? Plus you know black folks, especially black men wont use banks ( nobody should) and if theyre traveling could likely have a decent amount of cash on them. Seems like more like robbery than racial profiling. It has more to do with being less educated in the law and more likely to be a victim in court. Huwyte people would likely call their lawyer on the spot or not be carrying cash in the first place.
The lackey's with badges are Lenin's useful idiots. Hammered home on this site. Puppets that serve the Yahoo's. Did kimmy cheatle really resign after failing to protect Drumpf, and refund her $280,000 salary. Nobody resigned or got fired. All lies.
DIA talks to DEA who talks to the FBI and ATF who talks to the FAA who talks the Fusion centers who talks to. . . . the banks. No privacy. Anywhere. Behavioral nudging.
What I didn't offer is that SLAVES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE ANY POSSESSIONS AND WHAT THEY DO HAVE BELONGS TO THE MASTER.
This is why they take it with impunity and at-will and why Paul INVOKED MARITIME LAW WITH A GODDAMNED GOLD FRINGED FLAG BEHIND HIM.
It used to be that the banks were supposed to report any transations over $10,000 because that was the limit for tear your wrist. Now it is $600. When in all actuality banks have been reporting EVERY SINGLE DOLLAR TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE FROM THE BEGINNING.
And of course there's the "Clint-onian"-highlighted USC 42§ 1981(a). Let's not forget that code.
"All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other."
Where "exaction is:
"inflict any other harm which would not benefit the [hypocritical] actor. Model Penal Code, No. 223.4.
It has also been defined as corrupt demanding or receiving by a person in office of a fee for services which should be performed gratuitously; or, where compensation is permissible, of a larger fee than the law justifies, or a fee not due. Term applies to persons who exact money either for the performance of a duty, the prevention of injury, or the exercise of influence, and covers the obtaining of money or other property by operating on fear or credulity, or by promise to conceal the crimes of others. Term in comprehensive or general sense signifies any oppression under color of right, and in strict or technical sense signifies unlawful taking by any officer, under color of office, of any money or thing of value not due him, more than is due, or before it is due."
And in one way a most important word that's not readily ever understood is the word Usufruct. For me, that kind-a sums it all up if you were looking to say it all in one word.
"In Roman Law, usufruct was a type of servitude or "ius in re aliena", a right in another's property. The usufructuary never had possession of this property (on the basis that if he possessed at all, he did so through the owner), but he did have an "in rem" right to the property itself. Unlike the owner, he did not have the right of alienation ("abusus"), but he could sell or let his enjoyment of the usufruct. Despite the usufructuary's lack of possession a modified form of the possessory interdicts was available to him."
Those "deferential" congressmen should stop prevaricating. Their niceties about preventing the crime that they are apart of -- as if, they'll eventually get around to offing Vinnie -- is truly disgusting.
The suit and tie is the uniform of the moder day criminal. In this case however, these federal pigs are street thugs. Just say NO. Tell them to fuck off and pound sand.
Because one of the Americans' favorite changeless idols is convenience that action is dubious. This idol stands in the heart and deceptively informs and fills the head with excuses. It has disarmed fighting back in any substantive way while the tecehnotronic gates imperceptibly swing closed on the living and the almost dead; ergo, the riddance of most cash and checks, the decades-long taught preference of credit cards, the behavioral inculcation to debit and (Europe-Mastercard-Visa) "chipped" EMV payment brands, the further move to cellphone-based surveilled Apple & Google payments, and eventually -- and this is amazing -- to facial & palm recognition and DNA/blood unique identification and authorization.
1940's Europe may show us that a quick shower after a difficult train ride is worth the ease and comfort of setting your heavy luggage aside for a while.
Esau (Iudom = "J"ew) sold his birthright to Jacob = Yakob = Deceiver for a bowl of porridge (convenience) and they've been fighting each other like that long drawn out scene of King Kong battling the T-Rex in the CGI remake ever since.
I mean is it really profiling? If 13% of the population is responsible for 54% of all the crime? Plus you know black folks, especially black men wont use banks ( nobody should) and if theyre traveling could likely have a decent amount of cash on them. Seems like more like robbery than racial profiling. It has more to do with being less educated in the law and more likely to be a victim in court. Huwyte people would likely call their lawyer on the spot or not be carrying cash in the first place.
The lackey's with badges are Lenin's useful idiots. Hammered home on this site. Puppets that serve the Yahoo's. Did kimmy cheatle really resign after failing to protect Drumpf, and refund her $280,000 salary. Nobody resigned or got fired. All lies.
Thugs.
the true meaning of ORGANIZED crime.
DIA talks to DEA who talks to the FBI and ATF who talks to the FAA who talks the Fusion centers who talks to. . . . the banks. No privacy. Anywhere. Behavioral nudging.
Sometimes I don't diatribe under the Stack.
What I didn't offer is that SLAVES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE ANY POSSESSIONS AND WHAT THEY DO HAVE BELONGS TO THE MASTER.
This is why they take it with impunity and at-will and why Paul INVOKED MARITIME LAW WITH A GODDAMNED GOLD FRINGED FLAG BEHIND HIM.
It used to be that the banks were supposed to report any transations over $10,000 because that was the limit for tear your wrist. Now it is $600. When in all actuality banks have been reporting EVERY SINGLE DOLLAR TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE FROM THE BEGINNING.
And of course there's the "Clint-onian"-highlighted USC 42§ 1981(a). Let's not forget that code.
"All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other."
Where "exaction is:
"inflict any other harm which would not benefit the [hypocritical] actor. Model Penal Code, No. 223.4.
It has also been defined as corrupt demanding or receiving by a person in office of a fee for services which should be performed gratuitously; or, where compensation is permissible, of a larger fee than the law justifies, or a fee not due. Term applies to persons who exact money either for the performance of a duty, the prevention of injury, or the exercise of influence, and covers the obtaining of money or other property by operating on fear or credulity, or by promise to conceal the crimes of others. Term in comprehensive or general sense signifies any oppression under color of right, and in strict or technical sense signifies unlawful taking by any officer, under color of office, of any money or thing of value not due him, more than is due, or before it is due."
And in one way a most important word that's not readily ever understood is the word Usufruct. For me, that kind-a sums it all up if you were looking to say it all in one word.
"In Roman Law, usufruct was a type of servitude or "ius in re aliena", a right in another's property. The usufructuary never had possession of this property (on the basis that if he possessed at all, he did so through the owner), but he did have an "in rem" right to the property itself. Unlike the owner, he did not have the right of alienation ("abusus"), but he could sell or let his enjoyment of the usufruct. Despite the usufructuary's lack of possession a modified form of the possessory interdicts was available to him."
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/451479
N.B.
Those "deferential" congressmen should stop prevaricating. Their niceties about preventing the crime that they are apart of -- as if, they'll eventually get around to offing Vinnie -- is truly disgusting.
The suit and tie is the uniform of the moder day criminal. In this case however, these federal pigs are street thugs. Just say NO. Tell them to fuck off and pound sand.
Because one of the Americans' favorite changeless idols is convenience that action is dubious. This idol stands in the heart and deceptively informs and fills the head with excuses. It has disarmed fighting back in any substantive way while the tecehnotronic gates imperceptibly swing closed on the living and the almost dead; ergo, the riddance of most cash and checks, the decades-long taught preference of credit cards, the behavioral inculcation to debit and (Europe-Mastercard-Visa) "chipped" EMV payment brands, the further move to cellphone-based surveilled Apple & Google payments, and eventually -- and this is amazing -- to facial & palm recognition and DNA/blood unique identification and authorization.
1940's Europe may show us that a quick shower after a difficult train ride is worth the ease and comfort of setting your heavy luggage aside for a while.
That is poetry to my mind. Brilliant explanation. Convenience store idiots.
Esau (Iudom = "J"ew) sold his birthright to Jacob = Yakob = Deceiver for a bowl of porridge (convenience) and they've been fighting each other like that long drawn out scene of King Kong battling the T-Rex in the CGI remake ever since.
Thank you for saying so.
ActBlue (the DNC's money-funneling gizmo).