The Frenemy of my Frenemy is my Frenemy
frenemy, frĕn′ə-mē; noun
A person who is ostensibly friendly or collegial with someone but who is actually antagonistic or competitive.
Someone who pretends to be your friend, but is really your enemy.
A fair-weather friend who is also a rival.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
I'm not a doctor. I can't give medical advice. But it seems that they can't either.
Here is my review of the material that was sent in by our Little Red Hens so far on whether Naltrexone is friend or foe.
https://selfhacked.com/blog/top-22-scientific-health-benefits-low-dose-naltrexone/
6 Potential Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) Uses for Pain & More
Written by Ana Aleksic, MSc (Pharmacy) | Last updated: November 3, 2021
Synopsis can be found in the warning that is at the beginning of the article:
LDN is not FDA-approved for pain or any other indication. It is still a highly experimental approach.
LDN does not treat cancer. It was never properly researched in cancer patients and should not be recommended due to a lack of data.
What this tells me is that Project Paperclip is in full battle mode.
The FDA, of course, is a psychological warfare arm of the system that is set up to use you as a lab rat for undisclosed purposes. When a drug company submits a drug for approval by the military AGENCY the drug company sends the FDA the studies that the DRUG COMPANY did itself, the FDA reads it, says: yeah that looks like it won't kill too many people to raise enough public outcry and then rubber stamps it. Of course with COVID there was plenty of outcry but at this stage in the Paperclip being threaded through your eye and out your ear to hang you like a shrunken head they just don't give a damn and then palliate the masses with We didn't have enough data - We need more study - Adults dropping dead happens all the time...
In keeping with Sun Tzu's principles of elegant and economic warfare it is always best to convince your enemy to kill themselves, and then SELL them the means by which to do it. Win/Win.
Let's take a look at the material above in light of what I just outlined:
- The FDA is supposed to protect us against harm. Lie.
- The FDA approves drugs for specific use. Not really, they read a study they didn't do themselves and just shrug.
- The FDA does NOT approve off-label use. Not really, they don't PROHIBIT off-label use which is the same as approving it. Otherwise a REGULATORY AGENCY WOULD SAY: Hey! You're off the fucking script. We didn't say you could do that! I mean if the USDA (same pig - different lipstick) can with weapons drawn raid a diary farm selling raw milk privately, and the FDA with weapons drawn confiscates materials, records, and money from DOCTORS trying to heal cancer, then why is all of this off-label shit happening without any resistance?
BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ENEMY THAT THEY ARE SELLING THE WEAPONS TO SO THAT THEY CAN GET THE DATA ON HOW WELL THEIR OPERATION WORKED.
The thing that pushed me over the edge with the information presented in this article is this:
The whole hypothetical basis for these potential effects stems from Dr. Bihar’s claims about LDN boosting endorphins. Higher endorphins are thought to subsequently rearranging of cells in the immune system. This mechanism hasn’t been proven.
LDN is hypothesized to affect autoimmune disorders by boosting endorphins and rebalancing the immune system via T-helper cells. Clinical trials are yet to confirm this.
By keeping the microglia in a resting state and increasing endorphins, low-dose naltrexone is hypothesized to reduce the pain and inflammation in CRPS. Yet, no clinical trials back up this use.
These early studies did report increased endorphins and improved symptoms in autistic children who received naltrexone.
The effects of LDN on cocaine addiction in humans are unknown. In rats, LDN with a dopamine-blocking drug (L-tetrahydropalmatine) prevented cocaine abuse relapse. It reduced drug-seeking behavior and increased endorphins without causing fatigue and sedation. Human trials are required.
Go with me on this: The oxymorphone is claimed to bind to opioid receptors but NOT activate them. They can't saturate ALL of the receptors, but if they did then the body UPREGULATES the receptor sites. There are claims that endorphins and enkephalins are also upregulated due to the drug's interference. Both of those are natural forms of opioids that the body makes. But if the body is now flooded with opioids (natural or not) but those ACTIVATE the receptor sites that then allow cell permissivity to herpes then OUR ENTIRE PURPOSE HAS BEEN DEFEATED. The cat in Tom & Jerry has just eaten the mouse that crawls out its ass to then run back to the cat's face to start a new episode of the cartoon. Don't let me anywhere near kid's programming!
coupled with:
"Long-term safety unknown"
that implicates the FDA being in on a scam.
So, this was the first article I reviewed and I'm already giving two thumbs and two stinky big toes down to ANYONE thinking of guinea pigging themselves for the pharmaceutical god.
Favorite so far: I'm not a doctor. I can't give medical advice. But it seems that they can't either.
I think it’s time for folks to get off the Big Harma hamster wheel of death and look into more sound and natural cures. Not treatments, cures. For me if it’s fda approved, that’s a red flag telling you run like the wind!
And you are spot on in the approval, they do have formulas that calculate in deaths, compared to profit. Folks need to understand they are not here to help you in anyway, your nothing more than a human lab rat in their demonic agenda.
Like Nancy Reagan said, “Just say NO” to drugs. Those who do live longer, happier lives.