Neural Linguistic Programming sneaks words into the Lex I Con (Lex = Law that you are being Conned with) to where one day NO ONE was saying, these words, but the next day people can’t vomit a sentence without the meaningless bullshit:
Challenge (Problem)
Oprah Nudity (Opportunity is 5 syllables spoken by cave-idiots that merely means: CHANCE)
Moving Forward (never look back at when things were better or just remain in stasis or neutral to avoid things getting worse. when has a software ‘upgrade’ been ANYTHING other than a total fucking disaster?)
Reaching Out (this is called brachiating and is what monkeys and apes do to navigate the trees without grabbing onto a snake)
The ONLY application for this kind of robotics is to bring an autonomous battle chassis housing the Cloud-based A.I. Swarm Entity up to the level of organic beings so that it can hunt/kyll said organic beings that might have the skills of parkour to try to escape it resisting assimilation or prosecution.
That was of course, learned from your Darwinian Uncle…
practiced by evolutionary throw-back wannabes
But not in China….
But maybe in NYC…
But, it’s late (early) and I haven’t slept (much) so I got distracted with the deeper meaning of NLP from a Millie Tarry perspective, before finishing with another NLP.
If you have a fear of heights then this would not be an exhilerating…
Experience for you.
Experience is another NLP vomit word to put your mind in the mode of being a voyeur (just fine for me in parkour because I’d have ended up worse than the chinee guy) or someone paying for an amusement part ride (for the ‘experience’ of excitement with ‘less risk’) which has served its masters well in lulling the cattle into a sense that what has been happening on the world stage is an exciting experience in the form of ENTERTAINMENT so while buildings and children are turned to rubble; and a replacement ARMY has already been WELCOMED IN to a failed nation that is in receivership to China (that can’t even keep its buildings upright); folks have nearly one billion Harry Potter Magick Wands but haven’t done a goddamned thing about fuck-all. I guess they’re waiting to see how the movie ends.
Spoiler: You won’t be around to see it, motherfuckers.
so… MEH…
ANOTHER NLfuckingP word that I knew INSTANTLY without ever having to look it up came from Yiddish.
Meh (/mɛ/) is a colloquial interjection used as an expression of indifference or boredom. It is often regarded as a verbal equivalent of a shrug of the shoulders. The use of the term "meh" shows that the speaker is apathetic, uninterested, or indifferent to the question or subject at hand. It is occasionally used as an adjective, meaning something is mediocre or unremarkable.
Origin
The word may come from the Yiddish language. In Alexander Harkavy's Yiddish-English-Hebrew Dictionary of 1898 and at least one later edition, intended for the use of Yiddish-speakers, the English translation offered is merely a bleating or baa sound; by the much-developed 1928 edition, it is translated as an interjection meaning “be as it may”, or the adjective “so-so”. It is more recently defined as "well then; expression of dismissal". Hooray for Yiddish, by Leo Rosten uses the phonetic spelling "mnyeh", capturing its breathy, expressive enunciation by Yiddish-speakers. This pronunciation is echoed by the poet W. H. Auden's use of "mneh", in a dismissive allusion to the Moon landing; Auden was in New York before and after World War Two, and developed a close interest in Jewish conversation and culture.
All the above meanings suggest its close linkage with the Jewish shrug, which is both a staple of acceptable humour among Jews, and of anti-Semitic caricature. Thus, as a Yiddish word adopted into (American) English, it stems from the interplay of Jews with Anglo-Saxon culture past and present, an ambivalent expression of indifference, either good-humoured or contemptuous. Perhaps this accounts for its currency in the modern fast-changing multi-cultural world, now the leading English verbal alternative for a (continental) shrug, often directed toward something novel or foreign, newly fashionable, overly familiar or much-hyped.
Popularization
As early as 1992, meh appeared in a Usenet posting in a discussion referring to the television series Melrose Place.
Meh's popularity surged after its use on the American animated television series The Simpsons. It was first used in the 1994 episode "Sideshow Bob Roberts", when a librarian reacts to Lisa's surprise that voting records are not classified. It also appeared later in "Lisa's Wedding" after Marge weaves the words "Hi Bart" on a loom to try to pique her son's interest in weaving, to which he responds "meh". In the 2001 episode "Hungry, Hungry Homer", Lisa spells out the word for emphasis ("M-E-H"), after Homer tries to interest her (Lisa) and Bart into going to the theme park "Blockoland". American lexicographer Benjamin Zimmer wrote in 2006, "Whatever Yiddish origins the interjection might have had, they have been lost in post-Simpsons usage." Zimmer contacted Simpsons writer John Swartzwelder, who was responsible for "Hungry Hungry Homer", who said "I had originally heard the word from an advertising writer named Howie Krakow back in 1970 or 1971 who insisted it was the funniest word in the world."Zimmer also contacted the writers of the other two episodes but they could not remember where they had heard the word.
Typical Yahoody LIE: "Whatever Yiddish origins the interjection might have had, they have been lost in post-Simpsons usage."
Yeshua on a Pogo Stick! This is stealth NLP where ONE DAY NO ONE WAS SPEAKING YIDDISH, BUT NOW EVERYONE SAYS IT REFLEXIVELY AS IF IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN A PART OF CIVIL DISCOURSE, NEVER ONCE SUSPECTING THAT IT WAS AN NLP PLANT INTO THE MINDS OF THE GOY TO SHOW TO THE ELDERS THAT THEIR SUBTLE MK SCHEME HAD WORKED.
It is tactically no different then declarning a plandemic and then getting the apes to fight over the last roll of toilet paper. PROOF OF CONCEPT OF MIND CONTROL.
Lexicographer Grant Barrett wrote about meh and d'oh, another Simpsons catchphrase: "I suspect they're both just transcribed versions of oral speech, which has any number of single-syllable sounds that mean a variety of things".
Even mainstream publications have adopted usage of meh. The word's first mainstream print usage occurred in Canadian newspaper the Edmonton Sun in 2003: "Ryan Opray got voted off Survivor. Meh". In December 2009, meh was included in the BBC News Online list of 20 words which defined the decade. On October 14, 2013, ABC News posted on their website under headlines: US Government Shuts Down, World Says, 'Meh'. The New York Times's The One Page Magazine now features a "meh" list.
Meh.com, a daily deals website from Woot founder Matt Rutledge, debuted on July 9, 2014. Rutledge paid $100,000 for the meh.com domain in June 2014.
Inclusion in dictionaries
In November 2008, the word was added to the Collins English Dictionary, a British publication published by HarperCollins. Cormac McKeown, senior editor for Collins dictionaries, said:
"This is a new interjection from the US that seems to have inveigled its way into common speech over here."
"It was actually spelled out in The Simpsons when Homer is trying to pry the kids away from the TV with a suggestion for a day trip. They both just reply 'meh' and keep watching TV; he asks again and Lisa says 'We said MEH! M-E-H, meh?!'"
Sam Leith, writing in The Daily Telegraph, described the addition of the word, following suggestions received from the public, as a "gimmick", before concluding it was a "useful" word.
In Canada
HarperCollins' definition of "meh" included a "real example" of usage:
"As in 'the Canadian election was so meh'."
When complaints arose over this choice of example, HarperCollins' lexicographer Cormac McKeown, who chose the election reference, insisted that he meant "no slight to Canada"
My entire life for the past 24 years has been nothing but words and their use for precise communication. Therefore I am HYPER-AWARE of words and especially their origins and meanings. The subliminal creep of CONTROL TRIGGER WORDS into the speech of especially people close to me is VERY DISTURBING.
But because I am a wordsmith and have mastered the art of narrative, plot, subplot, subtext, inuendo and Continuum: What in the fuck does ALL of this have to do with the teachers being raped of their ‘bonus’ money?
Not a damned thing.
On the surface.
That’s just the emotional story used as a traumatic MK TRIGGER to embed their word:
CLAWBACK.
Do you see why I call myself the Anti-A.I. ?
I started with a Red Herring-story took you through the history of NLP mind control in an almost PARKOUR leap from one major but SEEMINGLY UNRELATED STORY within Continuum to another and landed you (hopefully safely but with no guarantee that you didn’t piss your pants) back into the lap of the Elders telling you what to do and think.
What is it that they want you to think?
That the Government Giveth - and The Government Taketh Away.
You will own nothing and despair of the future because there is no fucking future!
DENIAL is the principle that the alias Fritz Springmeier taught in his series on Undetectable Mind Control Slaves.
To BREAK a young mind the Handler would raise the child with lavish love, praise, and gifts then ONE DAY…
REMOVE EVERYTHING TO BREAK THE POOR CREATURE’S WILL.
This is the same TMK that these fuckers are doing either directly to you, and/or showing you how it does it to others WITH IMPUNITY and it begins with words such as the fucking Yahoodish Devilish CLAW BACK due to the concept that I have been teaching from having read the Biology of Aggression cover-to-cover:
You are less likely to fight against something that you are familiar with.
If you SEE someone being given a gift then raped of it
If the words Claw Back are used repeatedly by authorities (I never heard it until the past month)
Then your mind is conditioned that this is the New Normal.
The image alone of a taloned hand ripping the very life from someone is assault, robbery and rape that the unconscious mind is painfully (hence TRAUMATIC mind control) aware of.
Never forget that what passes for money is tokens in exchange for your blood, swear, and tears shed over time all of which equals YOUR LIFE.
So when they STEAL YOUR MONEY THEY ARE STEALING YOUR LIFE.
No wild animal would submit to this without putting up the fight of its life.
The Prey might even:
CLAW BACK!
People do not fight because they are “lazy”.
The original “programmers” placed that in the brain. Since we are a copy of the programmers, who made us to do the work they did not want to do…..I assume that they are even lazier than us.
Lazy parasites stay nearby their meal out of convenience….see bed bugs.
So the first programmer made a semi calculated mistake that now has become exponentially bigger for us. Not to fight back, submission is something we want to program our machines with.
AT YOUR SERVICE SIR!!
I hear a lot about this Neural Language Programming…..sounds to me like a mouth-ful-of-shit-word to replace the word “indoctrination” by proxy in all truth.
I have a friend who “decodes” news headlines into numbers and words. She uses Hebrew to analyze all words from English…breaking them by sound. She insist that all languages come from Hebrew so logically you go to go to that root. She also explains everything in relationship to the bible so to me this becomes the classic interpretation of the good and the bad game where the decoder now is exactly where the programmers want him/her to be.
I really disagree with this approach.
While I agree that the English language is the language of spells…You cannot use the same decoding in many other languages. It simply does not work in Italian, French, Spanish, Hindi, Russian, Arabic or any other language.
It also place the decoder in a very focused view and disallows to see other variations.
I told my friend this but her reply was ….”that is because God mixed all the languages in the Babel tower”……
You see this kind or reply is telling me that the NPL was very effective for this person so that is when I drop out from the race of word analysis and leave the decoder do their own make believe game.
There is a REASON of why we have a global Englishzation (I made the word up) of many latin origin languages and why the French, way back, made such a fuss about keeping their own linguistic root.
NLP might work only and its best in English but nothing else. I recognize that it takes a certain level of skill to look at words and being able to break them and extrapolate the original meaning.
A language is the main programming tool that shapes people to think in a certain direction. It completely makes a society way of thinking. Ask any bi-lingual or polyglot (non English speaking) how they see the world and their views and interpretation of events is different than most because their language literally gives different meaning to the some English words
This is why lyrics of songs "sound” better in English ….because you need cohesion to get adhesion and English does that better than any other language.
I would love to go down the list of words that have a complete different and sound in my language for instance, Italian is simply evolved from Latin.
BTW casting demons out of someone body and exorcism is still done in Latin….not English.
Of course Latin was another language of spells. Interesting enough is that those “spells” can be casted EFFECTIVELY only in Latin.
What is the difference between the two “spell" languages?
Latin is transparent, English hides within.
Latin does not need spelling either.
English needs constant spelling with countless variations of pronunciation even at the regional level.
Latin has genders, English has neutrals.
When you have a neutral you get that sort of ambiguity in a language that is prone to counterfeiting.
Transhumanism is reached better being genderless. Why? Because it is more difficult in machine learning to define the variations of genders in words. Sooooo…..transhumanism can be more successful when the machine does not have to recognize the gender. We are not talking sexuality here, but practicality.
But taking short cuts come with a price. Lazy. Lazy people take short cuts.
Now we are back full circle to the lazy creators who created lazy HU-MANS because they gave a little bit of DNA from column A and a little bit from column B. The HUman had to be strong enough to perform work that its creators did not want to do, but not too strong to overcome the lazy gene was neccessary. Like I said a calculated risk.
Zdravia, Thanks. You have just made me aware of an other one. I spilled I as [:AI:]. Since I was anti AI anti-EL I have not read the art tickle. I am not any more. I see that I can not see for my self witch AI I meant. Me or just dis art of facial crap. It made me wonder if dis has any thing to do with the fact that there was sell dom if any I in old rivers of natives.